Showing posts with label Early 70s. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Early 70s. Show all posts

4.30.2012

Blaise Pascal (1972)

As my son is named after this theologian/philosopher/scientist, a work buddy lent me this made for TV bio-pic, now a part of the Criterion Collection. The production is both elaborate in its sets and costumes, and yet quite simple in its script. The film essentially follows Blaise Pascal from his late teens through to his death giving him opportunity to speak some of his writings out loud and with props. There is little story or character development. In fact the setting draws the viewer in most as we are exposed to Catholic politics, scientific rivalries, provincial taxation, and superstitions.

The movie is slow, but full of Pascal's genius, so it's well worth the 2+ hours of view time.

IMDB

12.23.2011

Edvard Munch (1974)

A great skill was used to develop the film I just watched. It paints the portrait of celebrated and groundbreaking 19th century Norwegian artist Edvard Munch - famous for "The Scream." For three hours and forty minutes we survey scenes from Munch's life filmed as though it were a documentary where the characters are aware of the camera. Some characters are interviewed. Munch's diary is read as it was written, in the third person. And a narrator pronounces the chronology.

Beginning in a Protestant Christian home as a part of the middle class in Norway's capital city, Munch is surrounded by death, illness, and a social order that extorts and mistreats the lowest classes and their children. After losing his mother, he emerges into manhood and begins his rebellion with a group of bohemians who challenge every aspect of their culture. It is here that conflict arises between he and his father, but more strikingly it is where the great theme of his life's work begins: the threads that bond men and women together.

The series of failed relationships cast the learning and altogether rejected artist into a class all his own. He depicts the world in swirling colours, faces with pale and sickly complexions, and fades the sensory organs of his subjects where they meet their lovers.

Edvard Munch gains enormous popularity during his life while being lambasted by nearly all art critics across Europe. Pressing through all of this, Munch advances his new art form: visual psychology.

This is a masterpiece, unlike anything I have ever seen.

IMDB

The Day of the Jackal (1973)

We get a fascinating historical look at the early 1970s in this cat and mouse thriller. A detective uses all means possible to thwart an elaborate plot to assassinate French President Charles de Gaulle. There is a bit of melodrama, but essentially the film is saved by the sleepless detective who has an army of people in several countries combing through paper files as they try to identify the hit man hired by a terrorist organization (it wouldn't have been nearly as engaging if they had the internet and electronic databases at their disposal).

Kind of a cool film with some intriguing characters.

IMDB

12.13.2011

Prestuplenie i nakazanie (1970)

This Russian adaptation of Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment paces itself like the book, taking ample time inside protagonist Rodya Raskolnikov's head. It is done in black and white and the lack of colour adds the only other real joyless feature to the film beyond the glorious performances by the actors - who are unknown to the west.

Raskolnikov is pained by the conflict of his philosophical conclusion, that great men can accomplish whatever they like and should live without guilt and with impunity by virtue of the fact that they are great! He can not justify his philosophy because in his mind he himself is greater than his ignorant peers, but he and his mother and sister live in abject poverty. He decides to live out his philosophy by murdering a pawn broker, someone he views as a leech of society. The story plays out from here demonstrating his struggle to mute his conscience.

IMDB

2.20.2011

Horton Hears a Who! (1970)

Dr. Seuss's tale of an elephant who discovers a world on a speck of dust is lovingly animated in this classic. I haven't seen the digital remake, so I can't compare the two, but I really enjoyed this offering.


The story itself is true Seuss and God's truth.

IMDB

1.04.2011

The Sting (1973)

This classic has inspired a slew of caper films and still holds its own against them. Paul Newman and Robert Redford demonstrate class and wit as they swindle an even more evil swindler.


Two cons team up and recruit a huge team to defraud a big time city gangster who had one of the their friends executed. The film tracks their big scheme.

The charm really comes from the two main actors and the elaborate sting operation. Really fun movie to watch with plenty of tension to keep it moving.

IMDB

9.06.2010

The Conversation (1974)

Gene Hackman acts in this early film noir that helped sustain his status as a serious actor. He plays a wire tapper private investigator who stumbles upon a crime that is going to happen. Throughout the film he struggles with what his action should be as his job could facilitate the crime. Some great twists.


The ideas of incomplete pictures and what we should and shouldn't have access to give the film some great depth.

IMDB

6.20.2010

Badlands (1973)

A young Martin Sheen and Sissy Spacek bring young love to a disturbing end. This early Terrence Malick takes a first person look at violence in America.


Somewhat well adjusted teen, Holly, is swept off her feet by the fast talking loner hunk, Kit. When Holly's dad objects to their relationship, Kit steps up and shoots him taking Holly on a whirlwind run from the law.

Despite the brutality involved, Badlands is a beautiful film as the narration by an innocent Holly describes the events and feelings involved. The blending of nature photography with sequences of Kit and Holly striving for what they understand love to be demonstrates the powerful disconnect between selfishness and love. It also studies the close relationship of social acceptance of violence and the social expectations for romantic relationships back in the 1950's.

IMDB

1.15.2010

Amarcord (1973)

Federico Fellini is one of those filmmakers that I am not allowed to avoid as an enthusiast, and while I can certainly appreciate his otherworldly genre and his profound effect on cinema, his films can be rather tedious to watch.


Amarcord - one of his best known films - portrays a small Italian town as fascism and World War II pass by. The town is steeped in legend and crawling with wild-eyed characters, not the least of whom is Volpina the prostitute who swaggers in and out of scenes in her red dress. The town is the protagonist and a narrator shares tales with the viewer.

I enjoyed the film for its historical portrayal of Italy and the moments of comedy. Felllini's assertion that Italy's innocence and character remained despite Mussolini and having foreign military forces on their soil is clearly the message. I did not find myself overly drawn into the characters however and the music, as immortalized as it is, was awfully repetitive.

IMDB

2.07.2009

Chinatown (1974)

I've wanted to see this film ever since I studied the script in Robert McKee's screenplay bible "Story." 


Polanski serves up a veritable mystery that heavily influenced later P.I. movies because of its shocking material and less than glamourous subject. Los Angeles never seemed so hopeless.

The acting in the film is excellent - Jack Nicholson, Faye Dunaway, and John Huston steal the scenes together. 

Horrible crime is foreign, unimaginable to those with integrity.

IMDB

1.05.2009

MASH (1970)

Robert Altman barely holds this largely incoherent film together with a couple fool doctors. 


A Mobile Army Surgical Hospital is stationed in Korea in the 1950s. Sex, alcohol, and stunts keep the staff occupied when they are out of the operating room. 

In its day, MASH was an innovative film with ongoing dialogue in the background and plenty of ad lib from the actors. Today, it's difficult to stay awake with much of the lines being washed over by background noise and incoherent speech. The actors often mumble their lines on top of that. The movie is episodic and doesn't have much continuity to hold the story together.

In large part, besides producing some comedy, this film is a rebellion to the Vietnam war at the time and to the military establishment. 

IMDB

12.31.2008

THX 1138 (1971)

I honestly didn't have high expectations for a futuristic film from George Lucas as I'm not a Star Wars fan (though I do have a respect for Lucas as a filmmaker and special effects auteur, his writing is subpar). THX 1138 surprised me.


Humans are dispensable, drugged and heavily monitored in an underground city in the distant future. The most shocking aspect of the society is how calm everything is even when there are nuclear disasters, complete with high casualties, contained though they may be. The acting is superb as the drugged characters slowly awake.

Official Site | IMDB

4.01.2008

Murder on the Orient Express (1974)

Hercule Poirot delivers a masterful performance through Albert Finney. A snow trapped train in Yugoslavia gives detective Poirot time to investigate the murder of one of the passengers. He interviews each of the distinguished and oddball international passengers while deftly maneuvering through red herrings.

What struck me was how very portly and wooden Poirot is with glossy slicked back hair and a penchant for gourmet food and being bothered. His contemporaries seem either quite put off by him or very respectful because of his reputation as a masterful detective. Each character is portrayed brilliantly and it is fun to see young versions of some actors who continue to make films.

It is difficult to discuss the actual mystery without giving away the ending, so I'll restrain myself. I do say that piecing it together with Poirot pleases and the 25 minute expository ending titillates.

Truth: Right or wrong, people have an innate sense of justice that is used to excuse acts of vengeance.

IMDB

5.24.2007

The Godfather Part II (1974)

I watched this over 3 nights. I didn't realize to begin with that it was 200 minutes long!

In the second installment, we continue the life of Michael Corleone, heir to Vito - the original Godfather. He's moved to Lake Tahoe and is on a quest to make his empire stronger, richer, and unbeatable. The drama occurs primarily between Michael and his siblings, wife, and partners. I was shocked at how well the transformation held and matured from the first movie - a brilliant striking contrast scene at the end of part II helps recall what Michael was like.

The story is actually shared with the young Vito, played this time by Robert de Niro, as he flees Sicily as a boy and begins business in NYC. De Niro is a brilliant Godfather - an exact replica of Marlon Brando's. The film achieves much of its success with the contrast and evolution of its characters.

I enjoyed the Cuba interlude on the eve of Castro's revolution. I wish more people understood what Cuba was before Castro and communism; it was a Las Vegas filled with cheap labor, no laws, lots of drugs and prostitution.

Particularly, the camera work on this film kept my attention. Everything was very intentional from the angle to where it was panning. Truly a masterful film.

Of course the major theme is revenge, from Sicily's blood feuds to assassinations, and it's desructive nature. A great picture.

IMDB

5.07.2007

The Godfather (1972)

I rewatched it tonight. A true masterpiece of deception, betrayal, and the descent into darkness juxtaposed with honesty, loyalty and the continual rise of the Corleone family.

This brutal tale is humanity at its best and worst. What I truly appreciate about it is the way the characters die - without any dignity. Seconds more to live and they kick and scream and struggle. Those fleeting moments say a lot about the value of life - when it's your own. I don't think this film's violence is pornographic at all, instead it studies it rather than dismissing it in summary. I don't think this kind of film encourages violence any more than a testimony of a battered woman would. For me the films that don't honestly portray violence are the ones that lessen the impact of what murder truly is.

I see the women in the picture as representatives of society who blindly accept the evil. They could represent grace in some way I suppose, but they don't really acknowledge the violence they profit off of; much like how everyone profits from wars abroad, unjust international trade practices, and our history of imperialism, slavery, and plunder. What happens when we do raise our voice in protest? Do we lose our riches?

The Sicily sequence was a lot of fun after watching The Best of Youth. The mannerisms of the people really cause me to yearn for a real deep-rooted culture rather than a melting pot or what Canada has (wandering in the desert of pop). I want the vineyards and the quiet docks and the geese.

IMDB